top of page

Manuscript Preparation

The Duke's Journal of Science and Technology utilises free format submissions. Submitted manuscripts must be sent as Word or LaTeX files. Please refer to this Guide for Authors when preparing manuscripts. Authors should bear in mind the interdisciplinary nature of the readership of the Duke's Journal of Science and Technology, and, where applicable, emphasise the importance of the topic being presented to the scientific community, extending beyond specialists in individual fields.

New submissions should be made by reaching out to the Editorial Board, using the email address:

contact.thedukesjournal@gmail.com

 

To ensure fast peer review and publication, manuscripts that do not adhere to the following instructions will be returned to the corresponding author for technical revision before undergoing peer review. Note that submission implies that the content has not been published or submitted for publication elsewhere except as a brief abstract in the proceedings of a scientific meeting or symposium.

Free Format Submission

In order to fascilitate the publication process for authors, the Duke's Journal of Science and Technology utilises a free format submission design. This means that aside from the requirements for individual manuscript categories and referencing, authors are free to use their own format. 

However, the following are required for submission, in addition to the Manuscript Category requirements: 

  • Manuscript in Word or LaTeX editable format. Figures and tables may be included within the document or as separate documents. All figures and graphs must be produced by the authors. Figures and tables should have legends. Figures should be uploaded in the highest resolution possible. 

  • Author names, Email Adresses, Institute of Affiliation

  • ORCID ID (if applicable)

  • Title page of the manuscript

  • Conflict of interest disclosure

  • Data Availability statement (if applicable)

  • Permission to reproduce material from other sources (if applicable)

  • Ethics approval statement (if applicable)

  • Patient consent statement (if applicable)

  • Clinical trial registration (if applicable)

If the manuscript, figures or tables are difficult for you to read, they will also be difficult for the editors and reviewers, and the editorial office will send it back to you for revision. Your manuscript may also be sent back to you for revision if the quality of English language is poor.

In general, the order of sections within the manuscript should be as follows. Sections in brackets are only present in certain article types. For more information, see Manuscript Categories.

  • Title

  • Author(s)

  • (Dedication)

  • Affiliation(s)

  • Keywords: Please include 3 to 7 relevant Keywords

  • Abstract: The abstract should not exceed 250 words and should be written in the present tense and impersonal style (i.e., avoiding we). Abbreviations must be defined when first used and the abstract should not contain any references.

  • Main Text. For more information regarding Main Text subsections, see Manuscript Categories and Requirements.

  • Acknowledgements: All funding sources relevant to the work reported should be acknowledged, including grant numbers and names of funding bodies. Contributions from anyone who does not meet the criteria for authorship should be listed in the Acknowledgements, with permission from the contributor.

  • References

  • (Biographies)

Where appropriate, please ensure that:

  • Use British English spelling throughout the manuscript.

  • Use Greek letters in the character font Symbol or as inserted symbols. Do not use an Equation Editor to insert single characters (unless they are complex characters, such as vectors).

  • Use Equation Editor, rather than inserting equations as graphics.

  • All Figures, Schemes, and Tables should be mentioned in the main text in numerical order. "Figure 1", "Table 3", etc. should be written out in full.

  • In the Experimental Section/Methods, quantities of reactants, solvents, etc., should be included in parentheses, e.g., triphenylstannyl chloride (0.964 g, 2.5 mmol) in toluene (20 mL).

  • Physical data should be written with decimal points (not commas) and negative exponents (e.g., 25.8 J K−1 mol −1 as opposed to 25,8 J/Kmol).

  • Abbreviations and acronyms should be used sparingly and consistently. Where they first appear in the text, the definition should also be given. A list of abbreviations that do not require definition is at the end of this document.​

Manuscript Categories & Requirements

Research Articles

Research Articles are unsolicited, peer-reviewed reports of original research results. The essential findings presented in a Research Article should be novel and should not have been published previously. The data must clearly support the conclusions.

Abstract: 250 words maximum, and must include subheadings (Introduction, Method, Results, Conclusion)

Main Text must include: 1) an introduction, summarising the objectives and main conclusions of the work; 2) a Methodology section, highlighting the design of the study; 3) a results section to present all the findings of the investigation; 5) a conclusion, summarising the conclusions that can be drawn

Word Limit: No strict word limit; 2500-5000 words are recommended, excluding figure captions, and bibliography

Display items (figures, tables, schemes): Minimum of 1; 3-8 display items are recommended

Systematic Reviews

Reviews are peer-reviewed and provide an overview of recent progress in important fields of research, offering readers a guide to the relevant literature, an appreciation of the significance of the work, and an outlook on potential future directions. It is not intended that Reviews are necessarily comprehensive, but rather insightful, selective, critical, opinionated, and even visionary.

Abstract: 250 words maximum, unstructured

Main Text: Structured according to the PRISMA 2020 Checklist.

Word Limit: No strict word limit; 4000-8000 words are recommended, excluding figure captions and bibliography

Display items (figures, tables, schemes): Minimum of 1; 5-15 display items are recommended

Narrative Reviews

While also peer-reviewed, unlike Systematic Reviews, Narrative Reviews are unstructured and provide an overview summarising research on a particular topic of interest, without addressing a particular research question. This allows authors to present insightful commentary on new areas of research. 

Abstract: 250 words maximum, unstructured

Main Text: flexible, essay-style format organized by thematic subheadings to tell a cohesive story

Word Limit: No strict word limit; 1500-4000 words are recommended, excluding figure captions and bibliography

Display items (figures, tables, schemes): Minimum of 1; 3-10 display items are recommended

Perspectives

Argumentative in nature, a Perspective is a peer-reviewed approach to presenting a personal opinion on topics of interest to the scientific community. They may, for example, debate alternative points of controversy within a field of research, offer a historical viewpoint on notable past and present scientific achievements, or even speculate on possible future academic, technological, or societal advancements.

Abstract: 250 words maximum, unstructured

Main Text: flexible, essay-style format organised by thematic subheadings to tell a cohesive story

Word Limit: No strict word limit; 1500-3500 words are recommended, excluding figure captions and bibliography

Display items (figures, tables, schemes): Minimum of 1; 2-5 display items are recommended

Submission

Submission files should not be formatted for publication. In other words, please do not use complex visual formatting such as multi-column layouts, Word text boxes, or Word drawing tools.

All work used by the authors must be properly cited using the Vancouver referencing style. Manuscripts that do not attain proper referencing may be returned to the authors for additional changes.

Do not include information in the MS Word file that does not typically appear in the published article, such as word count, table count, page count, or table of contents. Figures may be included in the main manuscript document or attached as separate documents.

Authors may submit their work for peer-review using the email address: contact.thedukesjournal@gmail.com.

Peer-Review

After being submitted, all manuscripts undergo peer review by the Editorial Board. Authors will receive a confirmation that the Editorial Board is assessing their submission within 5-7 working days. 

Peer review allows the editors to ensure that work published in the journal remains of the utmost rigour. Editors also assess the use of the English language. Minimal corrections may be made in manuscripts in order to ensure readers' understanding.

Note that the Editorial Board also assesses Plagiarism and the use of AI in the submitted manuscripts. Any work that is found to be plagiarised in any manner will be returned to the authors.

bottom of page